P.S.KAILASAM
Ganapathy Naicker and another . . – Appellant
Versus
The Special Officer for Wakfs, Madras-4. – Respondent
“Notwithstanding anything contained in the wakf deed, no transfer of any immoveable property of a wakf by way of
(i) sale, gift, mortgage or exchange; or
(ii) lease for a period exceeding three years in the case of agricultural land, or for a period exceeding one year in the case of non-agricultural land or building, shall be valid without the previous sanction of the Board”.
2. It is common ground that though the Act came into force in 1964 and the two transactions in question were in 1965 and 1968, previous sanction of the Board was not obtained. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioners:is that by this amendment, all that was intended was to accord statutory recognition to the provisions of Mohammadan Law by which before the transfer of wakf property could be made, sanction of the Court should be obtained. In a case is which the sanction of the Court was not obtained before actua
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.