SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Mad) 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. J. R. Paul, J.
Mohanaprakasam (minor) Represented by guardian Sarojini, .....Appellant(s)
Versus
In re. .....Respondent(s)
Diary No. 9051 of 1973.
Decided On : 03 January 1974

Advocates:
K. Srinivasan and V. R. Gopalan, for Petitioner.

Issue of succession certificate.

Headnote:Indian Succession Act, 1925-Sections 371 and 370-Basis of jurisdiction to issue succession certificate.

       

ORDER:- A petition under section 370 of the Indian Succession Act has been filed by one Sarojini as guardian of a miner for the grant of succession certificate. It is stated in that petition that one Pachayappa Mudaliar who was ordinarily residing at Chingleput died intestate at Chingleput on 18th December, 1958 leaving behind the property mentioned in the petition and leaving behind as his heirs the petitioner who is the widow of his pre-deceased son, his grandson Mohanaprakasam and his second son Thillai Natarajan and that even during the lifetime of the deceased a partition suit was filed by the petitioner and her minor son in C.S. No. 109 of 1954 on the file of this Court against the late Pachayappa Mudahar and his wife and Thillai Natarajan and in and by a decree, dated 3rd January, 1957 this Court allotted certain items to the minor Mohanaprakasam and three life insurance policies which are the subject-matter of this petition were directed to be assigned by the deceased Pachayappa Mudaliar in favour of Mohanaprakasam, but before the assignmentdeed was executed Pachayappa Mudaliar died and an assignment deed was executed by the heirs of the deceased on 6th July, 1961 ; but the Life Insurance Corporation declined to act upon the decree passed in C.S. No. 109 of 1954 or the assignment deed without a succession certificate.

2. The office returned the petition with an endorsement as follows: " Since the deceased was not an ordinary resident within the jurisdiction of this Court at the time of his death, it may be stated how this petition can be filed in this Court without any impediment to the provisions of section 371 of the Indian Succession Act. “ The petition was represented with the following endorsement:” In C.S. No. 109 of 1954 on the file of this Hon’ble Court, this particular item was allotted to the minor. Although normally the Life Insurance Corporation could act on the decree copy, they still want a succession certificate. As this Honourable Court in exercise of its original jurisdiction has allotted this item to the minor, I submit that this Court can issue succession certificate. If there is doubt the matter may be posted before Court. “ Hence the matter was posted for hearing the Counsel for the petitioner and I have heard the counsel for the petitioner.

3. Section 371 of then Indian Succession Act reads as follows:” The District Judge within whose jurisdiction the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of his death, or, if at that time he had no fixed place of residence, the District Judge, within those jurisdiction any part of the property of the deceased may be found, may grant a certificate under this Part. “ Admittedly the deceased ordinarily resided at the time of his death within the jurisdiction of the District Judge of Chingleput and as such it is the District Judge of Chingleput who has to issue the succession certificate. Only if at the time of his death the deceased had no fixed place of residence then the jurisdiction of the Court will have to be determined with reference to the situation of the property of the deceased. In this case it cannot be said that the deceased had no fixed place of residence the at the time of his death, I find that in the petition itself it is alleged that Pachayappa Mudaliar ordinarily resided in Chingleput and died at Chingleput. Under section 371 of the Indian Succession Act the jurisdiction of the Court is made to depend upon one of the two circumstances, namely, either ordinary residence of the deceased at the time of his death or in the absence of any fixed place of residence the situation of any part of the property within the jurisdiction of the Court to which the application is made. The second part of section 371 of the Act, that is the jurisdiction arising by reason of the situation of the property of the deceased within the jurisdiction of the Court to which the application is made, would come into operation only if the deceased had no fixed place of residence.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top