IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Ramaprasada Rao, J.
S. Saradha and another .. .....Appellant(s)
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary, Education Department, Madras-9 and others .. .....Respondent(s)
W.P. Nos. 1459 and 1462 of 1973.
Decided On : 09 August 1973
“In pursuance of the resolution of the Council cited and subject to the conditions mentioned below Thirumathi A. Purna Ramesh, b.a ., b.t., Supervisor (Education), South District, is appointed to act as Assistant Educational Officer North), Corporation of Madras, in he scale of pay of Rs.250-10-300-15-450 plus the usual allowances and a Motor Car Allowance of Rs.100 per mensem vice Thiru O.A. Kanagasabai, b.a., b.t., Assistant Educational Officer (North), promoted as Educational Officer or until further orders.
1. the appointment is subject to her study of Tamil and qualifying within a period of two years from the date of her appointment by passing the ‘Second Class language test in Tamil’ held by the Madras Public Service Commission,
2. the appointment is purely temporary without right of probation and subject to the conditions contained under proviso to section 94 of the Madras City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 as amended by the Madras Act XV of 1965,
3. the appointment is subject to approval of the competent authorities.”
It was made clear that the appointment was purely temporary without right of probation and subject to approval of the competent authorities. Obviously this appointment was made under section 87 (4) of the Madras City Municipal Corporation Act, hereinafter called the Act. On 14th July, 1967, the Commissioner communicated the resolution of the Council as also his proceedings temporarily appointing the writ petitioner as Class II Officer and requested that the Government may approve of the panel of names and invited the Government’s attention to section 85 (3) (6) of the Act. In the meantime the Writ petitioner took charge as a temporary incumbent to the office. The Government after obtaining certain remarks on the communication sent to them by the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, on 12th October, 1971, pointed out that as the vacancy was not filled up in accordance with section 87 (1) of the Act, it was irregular. They therefore asked the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras, to send to the Government a panel of names prepared on the basis of seniority and merit of all the persons qualified for the post for then, to appoint. They referred to the other provisions of section 87 also. It may be noted that when the Government wrote their memo., dated 12th October, 1971, there was no reference to the representa tions by then said to have been made by the 3rd respondent to them. The Commissioner, Corporation of Madra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.