SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 26

G.RAMANUJAM
G. K. Jose and others – Appellant
Versus
Ramathal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.M. Santhanagoplan, for Petitioners.

JUDGEMENT:- All these four revision petitions arise out of a common judgment rendered by the appellate authority under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1960 dismissing the appeals filed by the four petitioners against the orders of eviction passed against at them by the Rent Controller. All the four petitioners herein are tenants in the various portions of the same building bearing different door numbers (Door Nos. 22/ 315, 313, 314 and 315). As regards all the petitioners except the petitioner in C.R.P. 136/ 79 the two grounds urged for the purpose of eviction are (1) wilful default in payment of rent; and (1) bona fide requirement of the premises for the purpose of demolition and reconstruction As regards the petitioner in C.R.P. No. 136/79 an additional ground of eviction hat been urged by the respondent-landlady. The Rent Controller by a common judgment in all the four petitions filed against the petitioners herein held that the ground of wilful default in payment of arrears of rent had been established, except in respect of the petitioner in C.R.P. No. 138 of 1079. As regards the ground of bona fide requirement of the premises for the purpose of demolition



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top