SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Mad) 486

M.S.NESARGI
Chennabasappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
V.T. Raja Reddy, for Petitioner.
T.S. Chouta, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent.

Order.- In these two petitions common question of law arises and hence they are being disposed of a by a common order.

2. Cr.R.P. No. 243 of 1978 arises out of the order dated 20th June, 1978 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Koppal, in C.C.No.184 of 1978 and Cr.R.P.No.244 of 1978 arises out of the order dated 20th June, 1978 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Koppal, in C.C.No. 185 of 1978.

3. In C.C.No. 184 of 1978 the Regional Transport Officer, Raichur, alleged that the petitioner had committed an offence punishable under section 12(1) of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) as he had, as a registered owner or otherwise in possession or control of the motor vehicle bearing registration No. MYR 4566 (lorry) without paying tax as per the provisions of the Act for the quarter ending on 30th June, 1976. In C.C.No. 185 of 1978 the Regional Transport Officer, Raichur, complained that the petitioner had committed an offence punishable under section 12(1) of the Act as he had, as a registered owner or otherwise in possession or control of the same vehicle without paying tax as per the provisions of the Act for the q










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top