FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
T. M. Rajaganapathi Traders – Appellant
Versus
The Commercial Tax Officer – Respondent
COMMON ORDER:-
Challenge in these Writ Petitions is to the order of the respondent dated 28.12.2004 which order has been passed after an order of remand made by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT), Salem, specifically directing the respondent to provide an opportunity to cross examine the seller at Bangalore with regard to the alleged purchase of Refined Sunflower Oil for Rs.37,39,000/- during the year 1993-94 and Rs.9,73,800/- during the year 1994-95. In fact, earlier, when the respondent expressed his inability to summon the concerned seller at Bangalore, the petitioner approached the Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal, Chennai, in O.P. Nos.1403 and 1404 of 2003 in which an order came to be passed on 09.02.2004, holding that the respondent should invoke the powers vested in him under Section 54 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act to summon the seller, namely, one Tvl.KLN Agro Tech (P) Ltd., Bangalore, and grant an opportunity to the petitioner to cross-examine them as directed by the appellate authority and in accordance with law.
2. Section-54 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act discloses that the assessing authority is vested with all the powers confe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.