SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 485

R.BANUMATHI
Matchakalai – Appellant
Versus
The Victoria Edward Hall & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:P.Senthur Pandian for K.Sridhar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition, filed under Sec.115 C.P.C. against the order of the Principal District Munsif, Madurai dated 09.07.2001 in I.A.SR.No.10559 of 2001 in O.S.No.37 of 2001, as stated therein.)

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the Order of the Principal District Munsif, Madurai dated 09.07.2001 in I.A.SR.No.10559 of 2001 in O.S.No.37 of 2001. Aggrieved over recording of Joint Compromise Memo filed by the Plaintiffs and the Defendants and dismissal of the Suit and the Order made in I.A.SR.No.10559 of 2001, the Third Party – Matchakalai has preferred this Civil Revision Petition.

2. When the Revision Petition was taken up for hearing, the Revision Petitioner represented by Counsel Mr.P.Senthur Pandian. Notice has been sent to Respondents / Plaintiff and the Defendants, who were party in the Suit O.S.No.37 of 2001. Notice sent and service awaited. Since Suit in O.S.No.37 of 2001 itself has been disposed of recording the Compromise Memo, the hearing of the Respondents is not necessary.

3. Relevant facts could briefly be stated thus: -

The First Defendant – Victoria Edward Hall (hereinafter referred to as D-1-Society) is a Registered Society. D-1-Society w


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top