SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 520

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. MURUGESAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. SINGHARAVELU
C.M.S.Evangelical Suvi David & Others - Appellant
Versus
The District Registrar & Others - Respondents
Writ Appeal Nos.2969/2001, 331/2002, 170 and 217 of 2004
Decided On : 24 March 2005

Advocates Appeared: For The Appellants :R. Thiyagarajan, Senior Counsel for P. Peppin Fernando, N. Paul Vasanthakumar, T.R. Rajagopalan, Senior counsel for M/s Aiyar and Dolia. For The Respondents:N.R. Chandran, Advocate General by V. Raghupathy, Government Pleader, C. Selvaraju, Senior counsel for T. Sellapandian, K. Chandru, Senior counsel for G. Thilagavathy.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power of the Registrar under Section 36 of the Act is limited to holding a summary inquiry for his own satisfaction and does not include the power of appeal. The Registrar's power is only to ensure that the registered society functions in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

Headnote:

Registrar's Power - Societies Registration - Section 36 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 36 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 - The judgment discusses the powers of the Registrar to enquire into the affairs of a registered society under Section 36 of the Act, including the power to enquire into disputes relating to the election of society members. It also addresses the power of the Registrar to issue directions for holding fresh elections and the right of parties to have the matter adjudicated by the court.

Fact of the Case:

The Division Bench referred the issue to a full Bench for adjudication regarding the power of the Registrar to enquire into disputes relating to the election of society members under Section 36 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the power of the Registrar to enquire into the affairs of the society under Section 36 is limited to holding a summary inquiry for his own satisfaction and does not include the power of appeal. The Registrar's power is only to ensure that the registered society functions in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

Issues: The main issue was whether the power of the Registrar to enquire into the affairs of a registered society under Section 36 of the Act includes the power to enquire into disputes relating to the election of society members.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the power of the Registrar to enquire into the affairs of the society is limited to holding a summary inquiry for his own satisfaction and does not include the power of appeal. The Registrar's power is only to ensure that the registered society functions in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.

Final Decision: The court answered the issue by stating that the power of the Registrar to enquire into the affairs of the society under Section 36 does not include the power to enquire into disputes relating to the election of society members.

Judgment :-

D. Murugesan, J.

This reference arises in the following circumstances.

2. A Division Bench in the judgment reported in K.ARIVANANTHAPANDIAN AND ANOTHER VS NADAR MAHAJANA SANGAM ETC., AND THREE OTHERS (1994 Writ Law Reporter 779) has held that the Registrar alone can register a society and it is before whom Form VII is submitted and any change in the membership or in the Committee should also be reported to him as per Section 15(2) read with Rule 17 in Form VII, it is necessary for the Registrar to be sure of the persons who are elected to the committee of each and every society which comes under his jurisdiction. The Division Bench has also held that wherever Form VII is filed and the correctness of it is challenged by one or other party being the members of the society/Sangam, he can enquire and find out as to whether who are elected to the Committee. On such enquiry, if the Registrar comes to the conclusion that Form VII filed is not correct and nobody has been elected, it will be open to him to give a direction to hold a fresh election, as Sub-section (9) of Section 36 empowers him to give such direction under the circumstances of the case. The Division Bench has also held that such direction would be subject to the right of the parties to have the matter adjudicated by Court.

3. The correctness of the said judgment was questioned in W.A. Nos. 2157,2191 and 2192/2002 and the Division Bench on 19.8.2002 referred the issue to full Bench for adjudication and the order of the Division Bench reads thus:

"In support of the direction issued by the learned single Judge regarding availment of the appeal remedy, the learned counsel of the Madras High Court reported in K.ARIVANANTHAPANDIAN AND ANOTHER VS NADAR MAHAJANA SANGAM ETC., AND THREE OTHERS (1994 Writ Law Reporter 779) Mr.R.Krishnamurthi, the learned senior counsel appearing for the elected managing Committee submitted that the said Division Bench Judgment needs reconsideration for the reason that Section 36 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) does not envisage any appeal provision to meet the situation like this, where there is a dispute with regard to the election of the managing committee. We some force in his contention as prima facie, we are unable to locate any power of adjudication of any dispute regarding validity of the election of the managing committee, and the appeal provision contained under Section 45 of the Act is attracted only when there is such power of enquiry under Section 36 of the Act. In view of this, we refer these matters to full Bench for adjudication. Pending further orders, the order of the learned single Judge dated 3.7.2002 keeping the order of the District Registrar (Administration), Madurai South, Madurai dated 24.6.2002 in abeyance, is suspended"

4. In view of the above, the following question arises for our consideration.

Whether the power of the Registrar to enquire into the affairs of a registered society under Section 36 of the Act would include the power to enquire into the dispute relating to election to the members of the society?

5. The earliest enactment on the field is the Societies Registration Act, 1860. After the advent of the Constitution, the powers to legislate by the Centre and the State were demarcated in 7th Schedule of the Constitution of India. List II relates to the power of the State Legislature to make legislation. Entry 32 relates to the power of the State Legislature to enact law including the regulation of Cooperative Societies. The said Entry reads thus:

"Incorporation, regulation and winding up of Corporation, other than those specified in List I, and universities, unincorporated trading, literacy, scientific, religious and other societies and associations, cooperative societies"

6. However, the Central Act of 1860 (Act 21/1860) also continued to be in force by virtue of Article 372 of the Constitution, which provided for continuance in force of exis

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top