SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 736

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. MISRA, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. MURUGESAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AR. RAMALINGAM
Ramaraju S/o.N.A.Subbaraja & Another - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (MD) Nos.1964 and 2100 of 2005
Decided On : 26 April 2005

Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioners:V. Selvaraj for N. Dhilipkumar, T. Lajapathy Roy, Advocates. For the Respondents:R2 & R4 Municipalities P. Srinivas, Advocate C. Selvaraj, Additional Government Pleader.

Headnote:Mandamus - Encroachment on Public Lands - Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920, Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002, Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 - The judgment establishes the legal principle that encroachments on public lands must be removed following due process of law. It clarifies the procedures for eviction from road margins and roadsides under relevant statutes and emphasizes the need for reasonable notice and adherence to statutory provisions. The judgment also highlights that payment of property tax or provision of utilities does not confer legal title to unauthorized occupation.

Judgment :-

(W.P.No.1964 of 2005:

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writ forbearing the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th respondents from demolishing or evicting or dispossessing any person from his or her dwelling house situated in Poramboke lands in Rajapalayam Taluk for which tax has been assessed by the 4th respondent Municipality.

W.P.No.2100 of 2005:

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other Writ or direction in the nature of Writ forbearing the Respondents No.1 to 3 from evicting and demolishing the houses of the permanent residents of Kodaikanal whose houses are assessed to property and house taxes by Respondents No.1 to 3 except by due process of Law.)

Common Order

These two public interest litigations have been filed on behalf of some of the residents of Rajapalayam in Virudhunagar District and Kodaikanal in Dindigul District respectively. The questions raised in both the writ petitions being similar, such petitions were heard together and shall be disposed by the common order.

2. W.P.No.1964 of 2005 has been filed by a resident of Rajapalayam, who is running a Social Welfare Organisation, seeking prevention of eviction of poor people who are in occupation of Government poramboke lands in Rajapalayam Municicipal Area. It has been stated in the affidavit that Malayadipatti Village in Rajapalayam Municipality has a total population of about 20,000 and even today, the authorities of the temple are demanding lease amount from the people stating that the lands are temple lands and on the other hand the fourth respondent Municipality continues to assess and collect property tax from the people. It is further stated that the other areas like Avarampatti, Suraikaipatti, Ooranipatti, Amman Pottal Street, Sammandhapuram, Madasamy Koil Street public are also similarly placed and most of them do not have lands of their own and in all these areas there are nearly about 30,000 families who have put up houses in poramboke lands and the fourth respondent Municipality had also assessed and is collecting house tax from them.

2.1. It is stated by the petitioner that in view of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.689 of 2005 on 02.02.200t and 17.02.2005 and the subsequent orders in W.P.No.1130 of 2005, dated 25.02.2005, the fourth respondent Municipality is now taking emergent and indiscriminate steps to evict thousands of families who have constructed houses in poramboke lands which they have been occupying for generations. It is further stated that their names are found in voter's list, they have ration cards, they are enjoying water supply connection and their houses have been assessed to tax by Municipality. The specific prayer in the writ petition is to

"..... issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the nature of writ forbearing the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th respondents from demolishing or evicting or dispossessing any person from his or her dwelling house situated in Poramboke lands in Rajapalayam Taluk for which tax has been assessed by the 4th respondent Municipality ......"

3. W.P.No.2100 of 2005 is filed by the Secretary, Kodaikanal Permanent Residents Welfare Association, which is a Society, registered under the Societies Registration Act. It is claimed that such writ petition has been filed in public interest against the action of respondent Nos.1 to 3 who made announcement by way of public address system in 16.03.2005 to evict the permanent residents including persons from Tribal Communities who have been residing at Kodaikanal for generations and their houses are assessed to municipality taxes and the respondent No.3 seeks to demolish the permanent dwelling houses of about ten thousand residents of Kodaikanal without giving any reasonable notice and without providing any alternative accommodation and hence this writ petition.

3.1. In the











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top