SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 909

R.BANUMATHI
Abdul Sukhure Bhai – Appellant
Versus
Durai Kuppuswamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For The Petitioner:T.Viswanatha Rao, Advocate.For The Respondents:N.Subbarayalu, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This revision is directed against the order dated 9.12.1999, made in I.A.No.415/1999 in O.S. No.372/1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam, ordering police protection.

2. The suit property relates to the vacant plot measuring 259 Sq.ft. in S.No.319/part new S.No.26, Palani, Gandhi Road, Arakkonam.

3. Case of the Plaintiff is that the suit property is a joint family property of Veeraragavalu and his brothers. The Plaintiff has purchased suit property from the said Veeraragavalu for valid consideration by the Sale Deed dated 23.9.1999. Since the date of purchase, the Plaintiff has been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property and also the share of other brothers, which formed part and parcel of the suit property. The Defendants have no right or title over the suit property; but are attempting to interfere with the Plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment and hence the suit for Permanent Injunction restraining the Defendants and his men from in any way interfering with the Plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

4. I.A.No.414/1999 :-

Along with the suit, the Plaintiff has filed this application for temporary injunction. On th
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top