M.THANIKACHALAM
R. Sudhandhira Devi – Appellant
Versus
K. Navanithakrishna – Respondent
(Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent control) Act praying to set aside the judgment dated 17.7.1997 rendered in R.C.A.No.88 of 1993 by the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Sub Judge), Madurai thereby reversing the order dated 28.7.1993 made in R.C.O.P.No.171 of 1986 by the Rent Controller (Additional District Munsif), Madurai.)
The landlords, who were successful in getting an order of eviction before the Rent Controller, have failed to sustain the same, when it was challenged before the Appellate Authority and the result is this revision petition.
2. The petition mentioned building, a non-residential one, belongs to the petitioners 1 and 2 in the R.C.O.P., who are sisters. The husband of the second petitioner is carrying on jewellery business in a rented building whereas the husband of the first petitioner has acquired experience in gold jewellery business. Because of these facts, the building is required for the husbands' of the petitioners 1 and 2 for the purpose of carrying on their business. The tenant, who has agreed to pay a monthly rent of Rs.300/= for the demised premises, has not paid the rent from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.