(Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed against the fair and decretal order dated 8.12.2004 made in I.A.No.641 of 2004 in O.S.No.973 of 2004 by the I Additional District Munsif, Dindigul.)

The defendant, who failed before the I Additional District Munsif, Dindigul, in resisting I.A.No.641 of 2004 in O.S.No.973 of 2004, which was filed by the respondent/plaintiff, to mark certain documents, as exhibits, is the revision petitioner.

2. O.S.No.973 of 2004 was filed by the respondent against the revision petitioner for specific performance, based upon a sale agreement. According to the respondent/plaintiff, as seen from the averments in the plaint, discharge of two this dated 20.10.2001 and 31.10.2001, also form part of sale consideration, in addition, those documents, evidence his possession also.

3. The suit for specific performance, filed by the respondent/plaintiff, is opposed by the defendant/revision petitioner, disputing the alleged sale agreement as well as questioning the admissibility of the said documents, in evidence.

4. Because of the dispute, 'whether the documents dated 20.10.2001 and 31.10.2001 and the endorsements the