M.THANIKACHALAM
Jeya – Appellant
Versus
Sundaram Iyyar – Respondent
(Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as against the order and decretal order of the learned Additional District Munsif, Tiruchendur in I.A.No.126 of 2004 in O.S.No.110 of 2002, dated 29.3.2004.)
The defendant, who was unsuccessful before the trial Court in resisting the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff to amend the plaint, is the revision petitioner.
2. On 4.8.2002, the plaintiff/respondent has filed the suit in O.S.No.110 of 2002, on the file of the District Munsif, Tiruchendur for declaration that the debt borrowed on mortgage, dated 7.2.1996, is discharged in view of the deposit of the amount of Rs.10,000/= i.e. for redemption, which was opposed, contending that the documents relied on by the plaintiff, are inadmissible in evidence. When the case was posted for judgment, after the closure of evidence, the plaintiff has filed I.A.No.33 of 2004, to amend the plaint, in order to include the prayer for recovery of possession, which was allowed on 6.2.2004. Thereafter, the learned Additional District Munsif, hearing both sides, adjourned the case to 22.3.2004 for judgment and just two days before the judgment is to be pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.