A.KULASEKARAN
L. Savariraj – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner & Another – Respondent
(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus as stated therein.)
This writ petition is listed today for admission and I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for Corporation.
2. The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the Assistant Commissioner, K. Abisekhapuram Division, Tiruchirapalli, the second respondent herein made in Na.Ka.No.C3/6220/2002 (Maiyam) in Na.Da.La.dated 30-05-2005 quash the same and direct the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to continue as watchman in the existing post with all his service and monetary benefits.
3. The petitioner was appointed as watchman in the first respondent Corporation. For certain alleged irregularities, the first respondent has issued a charge memo and on receipt of the same the petitioner has submitted a representation to the first respondent seeking to furnish the documents relied on him. The first respondent has also appointed the second respondent as enquiry officer, who conducted enquiry by examining so
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.