S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
Chandran & Another – Appellant
Versus
Gopalakrishnan – Respondent
The revision petitioners in all the revision petitions are the landlords. These revisions are directed against the orders of dismissal of R.C.O.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 1994 on the file of the Rent Control (District Munsif) Court, Gobichettipalayam, as per orders dated 6.8.1996, filed for eviction on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and also on the ground of denial of title, as confirmed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Subordinate Judge), Gobichettipalayam in R.C.A.Nos.3 to 5 of 1996, as per judgments dated 19.8.1997.
2. Though all the revision petitions arise out of separate judgments, since the landlords in all these revision petitions are one and the same and similar question of law and fact arises, all these revision petitions are being disposed of by this common order.
3. The revision petitioners/landlords filed R.C.O.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 1994 against the respondents/tenants for eviction from the petition premises. These Rent Control Original Petitions were resisted by the respondents/tenants in the counters stating that the rent payable is only 50/-, 100/- and 125/- per month and not Rs.200/-, 350/- and Rs.1,000/- per month respectively as claimed by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.