R.BANUMATHI
P. N. Deenadayalan & Another – Appellant
Versus
Ramagiri Narasimhulu Chetty & Others – Respondent
These two Revisions arise out of the Common Order of the District Munsif, Tiruvallur, made in I.A.Nos.631 and 630 of 2002 in O.S.No. 212 of 1989, dated 09-10-2002, dismissing the Petitions filed under Or.8 R.9 C.P.C. declining to receive Additional Written Statement. The Defendants are the Revision Petitioners.
2. The relevant facts for disposal of these Revision Petitions could briefly be stated thus:-
a) O.S.No. 212 of 1989:- The minor Plaintiff has filed this Suit for permanent injunction, restraining the Defendants from in any manner interfering with the possession of the suit property. The case of the Plaintiff is that the suit property originally belonged to his paternal grandfather Perumal Reddy. The said Perumal Reddy has executed a Registered Will dated 19-01-1987, while he was in a sound disposing state of mind. The said Perumal Reddy died on 24-07-1988. The minor Plaintiff has become the absolute owner of the property, on the death of the Testator. The suit property is in S.No. 237/5, which is inclusive of a Flour Mill and its accessories. The Second Defendant was only a lessee of the suit property. On demand, the lessee and his son handed over the possession o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.