SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1125

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MARKANDEY KATJU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
Royal Insulation (P) Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
The Commercial Tax Officer - Respondents
Writ Appeal Nos.1383 and 1384 of 2005
Decided On : 21 July 2005

Advocates Appeared: For the Appellant :Hema for K.J. Chandran, Advocates. For the Respondent: T. Ayyasamy Special Govt. Pleader.

The absence of provision for waiver or stay of the pre-deposit amount by the appellate authority in genuine and appropriate cases under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, causing hardship to dealers and rendering the alternative remedy of appeal illusory.

Headnote:

Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act - Appellate Authority - Pre-deposit provision

Fact of the Case:

The appellant's factory was on strike, preventing them from furnishing declaration forms, resulting in an order of assessment imposing a tax liability of Rs.7,88,440. The learned Judge set aside the order but directed the appellant to deposit Rs.3,00,000 towards TNGST assessment and pay the entire tax component for CST assessment.

Finding of the Court:

The court modified the order, directing the appellant to furnish a personal bond for the entire tax liability imposed by the assessing authority. The assessing authority was directed to pass a fresh order of assessment within a month. The court also highlighted the absence of provision for waiver or stay of the pre-deposit amount by the appellate authority in genuine and appropriate cases, recommending an amendment to the Act.

Issues: Grievance of the appellant due to the strike, imposition of tax liability, conditions set by the learned Judge, absence of provision for waiver or stay of the pre-deposit amount by the appellate authority

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for a provision permitting waiver or stay of the pre-deposit amount by the appellate authority in genuine and appropriate cases, to prevent hardship to the dealers and ensure the alternative remedy of appeal is not illusory.

Final Decision: The writ appeals were disposed of, with a recommendation to the State Government to issue an ordinance amending the Act to include a provision for waiver or stay by the appellate authority of the pre-deposit amount in appropriate and genuine cases.

Judgment :-

F.M.Ibrahim Kalifulla,J.

The above writ appeals have been filed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 16.6.2005 passed in Writ Petition Nos.19370 and 19371 of 2005.

2. Heard Ms. Hema, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. T.Ayyasamy, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent.

3. The grievance of the appellant is that since the factory was on strike they could not furnish the declaration forms which ultimately resulted in the assessing authority passing the impugned order of assessment by imposing tax liability to the tune of Rs.7,88,440/-. Since the grievance of the appellant appears to be genuine the learned Judge has also set aside the order of assessment, but however, imposed a condition that the appellant should deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only) towards the TNGST assessment apart from paying the entire tax component in respect of the CST assessment. In such circumstances, we only modify that part of the order of the learned Judge directing the appellant to pay the abovesaid sum. Instead, we direct the appellant to furnish personal bond for the entire tax liability imposed by the assessing authority both TNGST as well as CST. We confirm the other part of the order of the learned Judge setting aside the order of the assessing authority and also permitting the appellant to produce the required documents. The assessing authority shall thereafter pass fresh order of assessment preferably within a month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The appellant should furnish the necessary personal bond as directed above within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. Before parting with the case, we would also like to say that in Section 31 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') there is a provision for appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. However, the second proviso thereof states:

" Provided further that in the case of an order under sub-section (3) of Section 10, Section 12, Section 12-A, Section 14, Section 15 or sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 16, no appeal shall be entertained under this sub-section unless it is accompanied by satisfactory proof of the payment of the tax admitted by the appellant to be due or of such instalments thereof as might have become payable, as the case may be and twenty five per cent of the difference of the tax assessed by the assessing authority and the tax admitted by the appellant."

5. Thus, 25% of the disputed amount has to be deposited by the assessee as a pre-condition of the entertainment of his appeal. There is no provision for waiver or stay by the appellate authority of the pre-deposit of this 25% of the difference of the tax assessed by the assessing authority and the tax admitted even in genuine and appropriate cases. In our opinion absence of such provision permitting waiver or stay of the pre-deposit by the appellate authority in genuine and appropriate cases is often causing great hardship to the dealers.

6. In almost all the Tax Statutes wherever there is a provision of pre-deposit of some amount subject to which alone the appeal can be entertained there is almost invariably a provision permitting waiver or stay by the appellate authority of the pre-deposit amount in genuine and appropriate cases where the assessee can satisfy the appellate authority that he has genuine difficulty in depositing the pre-deposit amount either in whole or any part thereof or there is some other good reason for grant of stay/waiver. However, in the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act there is no such provision for waiver or stay even in appropriate and genuine cases. In our opinion this is not fair to the dealers.

7. In our opinion, there should be such a provision permitting waiver or stay of the pre-deposit amount by the appellate authority in appropriate and genuine cases because there may be cases where the assessee may not be able to deposit the pre-deposit amou


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top