R.BANUMATHI
Baskaran – Appellant
Versus
Mahalakshmi – Respondent
C.R.P.No.741 of 2004:- This Revision is preferred against the Order of the District Munsif, Maduranthakam, made in I.A.No. 204 of 2002 in O.S.No. 215 of 1996, dated 29-4-2002, allowing the petition filed under Or.6 R.17 C.P.C., thereby, allowing the amendment of 'A' schedule property regarding East-West measurement as 131.5 ft. instead of 88 1/2 ft.
C.R.P.Nos. 742 and 743 of 2004:- These Revisions are preferred against the orders of the District Munsif, Maduranthakam, made in I.A.Nos. 893 and 308 of 2003 in O.S.Nos. 215 of 1996, dated 8-1-2004 and 20-8-2003 respectively, allowing the Petitions filed under Or.26 R.9 C.P.C. appointing fresh Advocate Commissioner. The Defendant is the Revision Petitioner in all the above three Revision Petitions.
2. Common points arise for determination in all the above three Revisions and hence, all these Revisions were taken up together. The relevant facts for disposal of these Revision Petitions could briefly be stated thus :-
a) O.S.No.215 of 1996:- The suit property relates to 'A' and 'B' schedule properties, relating to the pathway – Narasam on the Southern Side. The case of the Plaintiff is that the Plaintiff has purchased 'A' schedul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.