SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1219

R.BANUMATHI
Mannariah & Sons (P) Ltd. & Others – Appellant
Versus
M. M. Sankaranarayanan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioners:Radhika Krishnan, Advocate. For the Respondents: No appearance.

Judgment :-

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 20.03.2003 passed by VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.9994 of 2000 in O.S.No.8575 of 1996, condoning the delay of 1008 days in filing the Application under Order IX Rule 9 C.P.C to restore the Suit in O.S.No.8575 of 1996, which has been dismissed for default. The Defendants are the Revision Petitioners.

2. The Plaintiff was the Company Executive of the First Defendant Company. Challenging the Notice of Revocation dated 24.04.1992 issued by the Board of Directors and the Second Defendant Chairman, revoking the services of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff has filed the Suit for Declaration, declaring that the alleged revocation of his office of Managing Director of the Defendant Company is invalid, ineffective and void and that he has been and he continues to be the Managing Director of the First Defendant Company. The Suit was originally filed in May 1992 on the Original Side of the Madras High Court. When the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Civil Court has been enhanced in 1996, the Suit in C.S.No.614 of 1992 was transferred to City Civil Court, Chennai and renumbered as O.S.No.8575 of 19











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top