SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1405

R.BANUMATHI
Murali – Appellant
Versus
Wilkinson Sword (India) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:M. Saravanan for Hema Sampath, Advocates. For the Respondent:M. Karunanidhi, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 29.03.2004 and 06.04.2004 passed by the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli in I.A.No.1049 of 2002 in O.S.No.182 of 1999 and I.A.No.306 of 2004 in O.S.No.182 of 1999, as stated therein.)

These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of the orders dated 29.03.2004 and 06.04.2004 of the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli in I.A.No.1049 of 2002 in O.S.No.182 of 1999 and I.A.No.306 of 2004 in O.S.No.182 of 1999 respectively, allowing the Petitions filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay in filing the Petition to set aside the exparte Decree on payment of Rs.1000/- and setting aside the exparte Decree dated 16.08.1999. The Plaintiff is the Revision Petitioner.

2. O.S.No.182 of 1999:- The Plaintiff has filed the Suit, claiming Rs.1,67,662/- from the Defendant. Case of the Plaintiff is that he was appointed as the Sales Representative of the Defendant Company. With effect from 01.07.1994, he was promoted to the post of Area Sales Executive with salary of Rs.5010/- per month. Later, under the Scheme, the plai




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top