R.BANUMATHI
Murali – Appellant
Versus
Wilkinson Sword (India) Ltd. – Respondent
(Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 29.03.2004 and 06.04.2004 passed by the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli in I.A.No.1049 of 2002 in O.S.No.182 of 1999 and I.A.No.306 of 2004 in O.S.No.182 of 1999, as stated therein.)
These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of the orders dated 29.03.2004 and 06.04.2004 of the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli in I.A.No.1049 of 2002 in O.S.No.182 of 1999 and I.A.No.306 of 2004 in O.S.No.182 of 1999 respectively, allowing the Petitions filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay in filing the Petition to set aside the exparte Decree on payment of Rs.1000/- and setting aside the exparte Decree dated 16.08.1999. The Plaintiff is the Revision Petitioner.
2. O.S.No.182 of 1999:- The Plaintiff has filed the Suit, claiming Rs.1,67,662/- from the Defendant. Case of the Plaintiff is that he was appointed as the Sales Representative of the Defendant Company. With effect from 01.07.1994, he was promoted to the post of Area Sales Executive with salary of Rs.5010/- per month. Later, under the Scheme, the plai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.