SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1245

R.BANUMATHI
Ponnan – Appellant
Versus
Govindasamy @ Sarkarai & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:P. Valliappan, Advocate for Sarvabhauman Associates. For the Respondents: No appearance.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition, filed under Section 115 Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 01.12.1999 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi in I.A.No.3167 of 1999 in O.S.No.689 of 1998, as stated therein.)

This Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 01.12.1999 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi in I.A.No.3167 of 1999 in O.S.No.689 of 1998, dismissing the Petition filed under Order VI Rule 17 C.P.C, declining to amend the Plaint. The Plaintiff is the Revision Petitioner.

2. O.S.No.689 of 1998:- The Plaintiff has filed the Suit for Permanent Injunction to restrain the Defendants from interfering with the Plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the "A-Schedule” Property and for Partition of his half share in the "B-Schedule” Properties. "A-Schedule” Property is the Rice Mill. "B-Schedule” Properties comprise of 13 items. Case of the Plaintiff is that he has been in enjoyment of "A-Schedule” Property – Rice Mill. In lieu of the share given to the Defendant in S.No.54/5 of Periyamampattu – vacant site and the house thereon, the First Defendant was allotted the property in S.No.13/4 and the terraced house th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top