SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1584

R.BANUMATHI
A. Anand & Another – Appellant
Versus
A. Perumalsamy & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioners:R. Krishna Priya, Advocate. For the Respondents:G.R. Swaminathan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 16.10.2003 and 06.04.2005 passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti in I.A.No.193 of 2003 and I.A.No.82 of 2005 respectively in O.S.No.70 of 1996, as stated therein.)

C.R.P.No.148 of 2004 is preferred against the Order dated 16.10.2003 of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti in I.A.No.193 of 2003 in O.S.No.70 of 1996, dismissing the Application filed under Or.XIII R.10(1) and (2) C.P.C read with Rule 74(1) and (2) of Civil Rules of Practice declining to send for the documents pertaining to M.C.No.6 of 1991 said to be available in Criminal Appeal No.346 of 2001 on the file of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

2. C.R.P.No.441 of 2005:- This Revision Petition arises out of the order dated 06.04.2005 of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti in I.A.No.82 of 2005 in O.S.No.70 of 1996, dismissing the Application under Section 151 C.P.C filed by the Revision Petitioners / Defendants seeking permission of the Court to mark the deposition of the witnesses in M.C.No.6 of 1991.

3. For better appreciati













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top