SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1603

MARKANDEY KATJU, A.KULASEKARAN
K. R. Ramaswamy @ Traffic Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by Special Officer & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:R. Amernath Rao (Khade), Advocate. For the Respondents: V. Raghupathy, Govt. Pleader.

Judgment :-

(Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondent 3 to ban all agitations in Evening Bazaar Road near CLS permanently.)

Markandey Katju, C.J.

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the third respondent to ban all agitations in Evening Bazaar Road near CLS permanently.

2. We are afraid we cannot pass any such direction. In a democracy, it is a fundamental right of the people to hold peaceful demonstrations as long as they are not violent or disorderly vide Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution. It is for the authorities to see to it that there is no breakdown of law and order or disorder in such demonstrations. The Court must maintain judicial restraint in this connection as held by a Division Bench of this Court in Rama Muthuramalingam vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mannargudi (2004 (5) CTC 554). The writ petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top