SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1784

S.ASHOK KUMAR
Kandasamy & Others – Appellant
Versus
Kolandasamy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For the Appellants:P. Jagadeesan, Advocate. For the Respondent:P. Valliappan, M.S. Krishnan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The defendants are the appel­lants. The plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from in any manner interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit properties viz., cart track. The plain­tiff claimed that he and his forefathers have been enjoying the cart track of about 13½ feet breadth leading from Mailapalayam ­Kamalapuram Panchayat Road and runs to­wards north and ends in the plaintiff's land. The defendants also executed a muchalika in favour of the plaintiff confirming the right to use of the cart track by the plaintiff. Since the defendants with the help of some rowdy ele­ments are threatening to interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of the cart track by the plaintiff, the suit has been filed for permanent injunction.

2. The defendants in their written statement contended that the measurement given as 13­½ feet as a cart track is not correct; there is an alternate cart track for the plaintiff to reach his house; the alleged muchalika is false; the, description of suit property is not correct the suit is liable to be dismissed.

3. The learned District Munsif, Mettur who tried the suit o



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top