This revision has been filed against the order passed in execution proceedings ant to the decree for specific performance passed in favour of the respondent herein. The respondent filed O.S.No.33 of 1985 for specific performance. The prayer did not include the prayer for possession. The decree was passed on 11.1.1989 granting three months time for execution of the sale deed on receipt of the balance of Rs.2,00,000. This decree has become final E.P.No.53 of 1991 was filed to direct the respondent to execute the sale deed. On 22.12.1994, E.P.No.151 of 1994 was filed for delivery of the property, against that C.R.P.No.3359 of 1992 was filed. But that was dismissed on 13.8.1993. The Supreme Court rejected the Special Leave Petition. In the meantime, the petitioner filed I.A.No.529 of 1992 for condonation of delay of 1173 days in filing the application to set aside the exparte decree. This application was dismissed for default on 14.7.1992. The petitioner filed I.A.No.785 of 1992 to set aside the order dismissing the application for default. The revision filed there against was not represented in time. The C.M.P.No.75 of 1997 to condone the delay in representation was also d