SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 1848

R.BANUMATHI
Rajasundari – Appellant
Versus
Gowri @ Avaduai Ammal & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:S. Kamadevan, Advocate. For the Respondents:Uma Ramanathan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 20.09.2004 passed in I.A.No.10477 of 2004 in O.S.No.12449 of 1996, as stated therein.)

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the Order dated 20.09.2004 passed in I.A.No.10477 of 2004 in O.S.No.12449 of 1996 by the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, partly allowing the Petition filed under Order 23 Rule 1(3) C.P.C and declining to grant leave to file a fresh suit. The Plaintiff is the Revision Petitioner.

2. Claiming that she is the adopted Daughter of Sankara Narayana Pillai, the Plaintiff has filed the Suit in O.S.No.1826 of 1993 before the High Court for Partition and Separate possession of "A" and "B" Schedule Property. "A" Schedule property consists of six items. Item (vi) of "A" Schedule property is situated at Chennai. Hence, the Plaintiff has filed the Suit after obtaining leave to sue. When the Suit was pending, due to enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of Subordinate Courts, the Suit was transferred to City Civil Court, Chennai and renumbered as O.S.No.12449 of 1996. Resisting the Suit, the Defendants have filed the Written Statement.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top