SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 1344

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.KANAGARAJ & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.MASILAMANI
A.Samivel - Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authroity and Additional Commissioner - Respondents
C.M.A.No.2837 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.16303 of 2004
Decided On : 19 October 2004

Advocates Appeared: For The Appellant :AR.L.Sundaresan, Advocate. For The Respondent: Senthilnathan, GA (CS).

Court under its discretionary power may pass conditional order for interim release of property.

Headnote:Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Deposits Act (XLIV of 1997), Secs. 7(6), proviso 9 -Special Judge passing conditional order for grant of stay-Appeal against-Held, interim release of property of the property may be ordered on certain conditions at the discretion of the court.

Judgment :-

V.Kanagaraj, J.

By consent, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. Today, when the C.M.P.No.16303 of 2004 was taken up for consideration in the presence of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent as well, this Court is apprised of the fact to the extent that the appellant has come forward to file the above C.M.P. praying for the grant of interim stay of the order dated 23.09.2004 made in O.A.No.44 of 2004 by the Court of the Special Judge under TNPID Act, Chennai, relating to the conditions imposed requiring the appellant/petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.10/lakhs.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the total number of accused are 31 and all are alleged to have had some nexus or the other in the defunct company of the appellant herein, and since the petitioner is neither a Managing Director nor even a Director and no such responsibilities are attached to the appellant whether it is policy making or decision taking in the affairs of the company. But two vehicles belonging to the appellant both stage carriage permitted buses run in the interest of the general public belonging to the petitioner, have been attached and for the release of these vehicles as an interim measure since application was filed by the appellant, while imposing conditions, the Special Court Constituted under the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, Chennai, has imposed an unreasonable condition of requiring the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.10/ lakhs, inspite of having imposed such other usual and reasonable conditions such as to furnish security for a sum of Rs.1/lakh, to give an undertaking not to dispose of the vehicles in question without the permission of the Court etc. which are the usual conditions reasonably imposed and therefore the appellant is ready and willing to follow. But the other condition to deposit a sum of Rs.10/lakhs since being not reasonable, having not been fixed on any legal principle but arbitrarily the appellant has come forward to prefer the above civil Miscellaneous Appeal further praying in the above petition filed in the above C.M.A. for an interim order to be passed immediately releasing the immovable property that is the two stage carriage buses bearing Registration Nos.TN-27-5-3366 and TN-27-D-5445.

4. On the part of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, cited the proviso to Section 7 (6) wherein it is held that

"the Special Court shall not release from attachment any interest which it is satisfied that the Financial Establishment or the person referred to in sub-Section (1) ha sin the property unless it is also satisfied that there will remain under attachment an amount or property of value not less than the value that is required for re-payment to the depositors of such Financial Establishment."

This Section is to the effect of an order that could be passed in conclusion of trial and at the time of the disposal of the properties in accordance with the decision arrived at and not for the interim release of the property on certain conditions which could be done at the discretion of the Court. Even Section 9 of the Act dealing with security in lieu of attachment where the property could be released on security which is left to the discretion of the Special Court and to its satisfaction and therefore since being the interim release of the moving object, the stage carriage permitted bus, the same cannot be unnecessarily kept idle without being run and being exposed to sun and rain thus reducing the value of the vehicles besides subjecting the general public to unnecessary inconveniences and hardships and therefore, it is desirable to release the vehicles bearing Registration Nos.TN-27-5-3366 and TN-27-D-5445 on such stringent conditions such as those conditions which are usually imposed on the owners of the vehicle and those conditions have also been imposed by the trial Court at the time of ord






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top