SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 1441

A.K.RAJAN
R. Nagarajan & Another – Appellant
Versus
R. N. Nachimuthu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For The Petitioners:P.Duraisamy, Advocate. For The Respondent:K.Kalyanasundaram, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This civil revision petition has been filed against the order requesting the trial Court to decide the payment of Court fee as a preliminary issue.

2. According to the revision petitioner herein, a suit is filed for declaration and possession. In a notice given by the plaintiff in the suit, it has been stated that the value of the property is Rs.2,15,000/- but when the suit was filed, the suit was valued at Rs.10,000/- and the Court of Rs.750/- has been paid. In the written statement filed by the revision petitioner/defendant in the suit, this ground has been raised stating that the property has not been valued properly for the purpose of court fee. The defendant wants the matter to be decided as a preliminary issue but the learned District Munsif has dismissed the petition. Against the same, the present civil revision petition has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the decision of this Court reported in Raju Gramani V. Srinivasa Gramani 1958(1) M.L.J. 308, it is held that "Objection by defendant relating to Court fee- If could be raised only in the written statement." In the instant case, the petitioner has mentioned in the written stat



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top