SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 1476

S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
T. Sivakumar – Appellant
Versus
K. Prabhakaran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For The Petitioner:V.Chandrakanthan, Advocate. For The Respondents:B.Tirupatikumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The tenant is the revision petitioner and the revision is filed against the eviction ordered by the learned Rent Controller in R.C.O.P.No.2093 of 2000 and as confirmed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority in R.C.A.No.410 of 2002 as per the judgment dated 31.12.2002 from the petition non-residential premises on the ground of own use and occupation by the son of the respondent/landlord.

2. The respondent/landlord filed the Rent Control Original Petition seeking eviction of the revision petitioner/tenant from the petition non-residential premises bearing door No.1, Nagarathinammal Colony, Govindhan Road, West Mambalam, Chennai-33, which is a portion measuring an extent of 100 square feet in the ground floor on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and on which ground the learned Rent Controller refused to order eviction and which has been confirmed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority. The other ground for eviction is that the petition non-residential premises is bona fide required for own use and occupation by landlord's eldest son, P.W.2, who is B.Sc.(Computer Science) Graduate and who stopped his employment after gaining experience and wit











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top