SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 1654

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
Maria Susai @ Felix & Others - Appellant
Versus
State of Pondicherry - Respondents
Crl.Appeal No.762 of 1997
Decided On : 09 December 2004

Advocates Appeared:A.G.Rajan, A.P.Suryaprakash, Advocates.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the testimony of injured witnesses, identification parade, and medical evidence to establish the guilt of the accused.

Headnote:

MURDER - Criminal Law - S.304 (II) I.P.C., S.324 I.P.C. - The judgment discusses the occurrence of a murder and injuries caused to witnesses. The court analyzes the evidence of the injured witnesses, the nature of injuries sustained, and the identification of the accused. The legal provisions of S.304 (II) I.P.C. and S.324 I.P.C. are central to the court's decision.

Fact of the Case:

The case involves the murder of Sundal Shanmugam and injuries caused to witnesses Rajaram and Iyyappan. The accused were convicted under S.304 (II) I.P.C. and S.324 I.P.C. based on the evidence presented.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty of murder and causing injuries to the witnesses based on the testimony of the injured witnesses, identification of the accused, and the nature of injuries sustained by the victim.

Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of witnesses, identification of the accused, and the nature of injuries sustained. The motive for the attack was also questioned.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the testimony of the injured witnesses, the identification parade, and the medical evidence to establish the guilt of the accused. The lack of a proven motive for the attack did not undermine the prosecution's case.

Final Decision: The conviction of the accused under S.304 (II) I.P.C. and S.324 I.P.C. was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed. The trial court was directed to secure the accused for serving the remaining sentence.

Judgment :-

R. BANUMATHI, J.

Appellants are accused No.1 to 4 in S.C.No. 6 of 1997 on the file of II Additional Sessions Judge, Pondicherry. For causing the murder of one Sundal Shanmugam alias Nattar, Appellants were convicted under S.304 (II) I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of Three Years each. For causing injuries to Witnesses Rajaram and Iyyappan, A.1 and A.2 were convicted under S. 324 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of One Year each.

2. P.W.1 - Rajaram is the second husband of P.W.3 - Gnanavadivu. On 29.04.1995, P.W.1 Rajaram was standing in front of his house in Kandoctor Thottam. At that time, A.1 to A.4 and two more accused armed with deadly weapons like Knives and Sticks came and abused P.W.2 - Umai alias Iyyappan. When the accused were coming near the house of P.W.3 - Gnanavadivu, P.W.2 was standing near his house just watching the accused. Accused asked P.W.2 to go away; but P.W.2 - Umai alias Iyyappan was still standing. Hence A.1 to A.4 caught hold of the Shirt of P.W.2 and A.2 caused cut injuries on the left Chin of P.W.2 with Aruval. P.W.3 - Gnanavadivu, mother of P.W.2 - Umai alias Iyyappan pleaded to leave her son. Because of the assault by A.2, P.W.2 sustained bleeding injuries on his head. A.1 asked P.W.1 as to why he was roaming hither and thither. So saying A.1 tried to attack P.W.1 with Long Knife near his Stomach. When suddenly moved, P.W.1 sustained bleeding injuries on his Stomach. At that time, one Sundal Shanmugam alias Nattar known to P.W.1 for more than twenty years had come nearby. On seeing him, all the accused persons shouted saying " Here comes Nattar, attack him ". So saying, all the accused ran towards him. A.2 twisted the leg of Sundal Shanmugam, who had fallen down. After he had fallen down, all the accused surrounded him and caused injuries with Knives and Sticks continuously all over the body.

This occurrence was witnessed by the Nephews of Sundal Shanmugam viz., P. W.5 Raja and P.W.6 Selvam alias Palai, who were coming from behind Sundal Shanmugam at a distance of about 10 metres. That apart, P.W.4 Suresh, a child aged about Ten Years had also witnessed the occurrence. After attacking the deceased, the accused had run away from the scene of occurrence.

3. Registration of the case and Investigation:- P.W.1 Rajaram and P.W.2 Iyappan alias Umai Iyyappan went to Odiensalai Police Station on the same day at 3.00 p.m. P.W.16 then Sub Inspector of Police, Odiensalai has recorded the Oral Statement of P.W.1 and registered the case in Odiensalai Police Station Crime No.54 of 1995 under Ss.147, 148, 307 and 324 r/w 149 I.P.C. under Ex.P.47 First Information Report. Injured P.Ws.1 and 2 were sent to General Hospital, Pondicherry for treatment.

4. P.W.16 S.I. of Police had taken up the initial investigation. He came to know that injured Sundal Shanmugam succumbed to the injuries at 3.55 p.m. On receipt of Death Intimation, P.W.16 altered the case for the offences under Ss.147, 148, 302 and 324 r/w 149 I.P.C. under Ex.P.48 - Alteration Report.

5. P.W.17 Inspector of Police, Grand Bazar Circle had taken up the further investigation. Scene of occurrence was inspected in the presence of the witnesses. Photographs (Exs.P.36 to P.38) were taken regarding the scene of occurrence. Exs.P.43 to P.46 Photographs were also taken on the body of the deceased. On the scene of occurrence, Ex.P.2 Observation Mahazar and Ex.P.49 Rough Plan were prepared in the presence of P.W.7 Ganesan and P.W.8 Dhanagodi. Blood Stained portion of right hand finger (M.O.3) of deceased Sundal Shanmugam was seized under Ex.P.3 Seizure Mahazar in the presence of P. Ws.7 and 8. Witnesses were examined.

6. On 30.04.1995, P.W.17 I.O. examined the witnesses in the presence of Panchayatdars and held inquest on the body of deceased Sundal Shanmugam. Ex.P.51 is the Inquest Report. After inquest, the body was sent to Autopsy.

7. Pursuant to the Requisition from the Inspector of Poli


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top