SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 62

V.KANAGARAJ
Anand & Others – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr.V.Gopinath, S.C. For the Respondents:Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side).

Judgment :-

Criminal Appeal No.497 of 2001 has been filed by the 1st accused and 5th accused, Criminal Appeal No.497 of 2002 has been filed by the 4th accused and Criminal Appeal No.1699 of 2002 has been filed by the 3rd accused against the judgment dated 19.4.2001 rendered by the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Octocamund in S.C.No.4 of 2000.

2. For the sake of convenience and for easy reference C.A.No.497 of 2001, C.A.No.38 of 2002 and C.A.No.1699 of 2002 are hereinafter referred to as first, second and third C.As. respectively. So far as all the above Criminal Appeals are concerned, since the case of the prosecution and the judgment rendered by the lower Court being one and the same, all the above Criminal Appeals are heard together and decided by this common judgment.

3. Tracing the history of the case as projected by the prosecution before the trial court, it comes to be known that the respondent herein in all the above Criminal Appeals has laid the charge-sheet against the appellants and another Sundar, who was arrayed as the 2nd accused before the trial Court, on two specific charges, the first one being, that on 23.5.1999 at about 11.30 P.M. accused 1 to 5 joining hands wi





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top