R.BALASUBRAMANIAN
K. Venugopal (died) & Others – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner & Secy & Others – Respondent
The second appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:
(a) Whether the lower appellate court is correct in applying the observation made by the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.4725/95 which is relating to the grant of interim order for the continuance of service of an employee in a matter wherein an individual has approached for the alteration of date of birth on the verge of his retirement?
(b) Whether the lower appellate court is correct in holding that the appellant cannot invoke the jurisdiction of the civil court and he is bound to convince the third respondent only in deciding his community status in spite of the fact that the revenue authorities have failed to consider various documentary evidence adduced on an earlier occasion?
(c ) Whether the lower appellate court is correct in summarily rejecting all the documentary evidence by observing that they are related to different persons, even though, number of documents actually belonging to the brothers, father and uncle of the appellant herein?
(d) Whether the lower appellate court is correct in reversing the judgment of the trial court without looking into appreciating several judgme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.