SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 172

K.SAMPATH
Ranjitkumar – Appellant
Versus
Gopal & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:----- For the Respondents: ----

Judgment :-

The civil revision petition arises under the following circumstances:

The first respondent herein filed suit/ O.S.No.521/1996, before the District Munsif's Court, Valangaiman, against his brother/the second respondent herein for a declaration that the suit property belonged to him absolutely pursuant to a settlement deed, dt.8.12.1986, by Late Sulochana Bai, mother of the parties. The second respondent was given permission to occupy the property for a period of six months to enable him to get possession of another property which the mother wanted to give him, and before doing which, she passed away. After her death, her heirs, including the first respondent herein, settled the other property on the second respondent. As the defendant did not vacate the property, notice was issued. The second respondent sent a reply refusing to vacate the premises stating that Sulochana Bai had executed a Will on 21.2.1986 bequeathing the suit property to his son as well as the first respondent's son and therefore the first respondent had no title over the same. The first respondent took a stand that the registered Will alleged to have been executed by Sulochana Bai was cancelled by her b










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top