SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 341

V.KANAGARAJ
Rajamani – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr.M.Kandasamy, Advocate. For the Respondents:Mr.O.Srinath, Govt.Advocate (crl.side).

Judgment :-

The petitioner, who is a third party to the proceeding initiated by the first respondent in Cr.No.32/2002 under Sections 465,468,471,420 and 120-B IPC and transferred to the file of the second respondent for investigation, has come forward to file the above criminal original petition on averments such as that he is having multifarious business activities of mining, purchase and sale of minerals under the names and styles of M/s.Abirami Mineralas and Chemicals, M/s.Sekar Mines and Sekar Sales Syndicate Etc. and the respondents 1 and 2, under the pretext of doing investigation in the said case on an alleged confession said to have been made by the prime accused in the said case viz. Prabhakaran that in order to over come certain difficulties, he paid a sum of Rs.16 lakhs to the petitioner, have given instructions to the banks to freeze the accounts of the petitioner, which, the petitioner came to know from the letters dated 14.9.2002 addressed by the Salem Branches of Allahabad Bank and the State Bank of India. The petitioner would further state that he has no business dealings or any connection with the said Prabhakaran and that all his business transactions are covered
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top