SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 420

K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM
R. Raghupathy – Appellant
Versus
Nil – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr. R.G.Rajan, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----

Judgment :-

This revision is directed against the order of the learned District Judge, Nagapattinam in Trust O.P.No.38 of 1995.

2. The said Original Petition was filed by the petitioner/Trust represented by its hereditory Trustees. With reference to "Mandagapadi" on the second day of Vidayathi festival of Sri Rajagopalaswamy temple, Mannargudi, a Trust was created by the plaintiffs/Trustees. The ancestors of the Trustees had constructed a bungalow mentioned as 'A' Schedule property. The idol of Sri Rajagopalaswamy is brought and a Mandagapadi is conducted by their family. The festival involves considerable expenses. One K.R.Raghunatha Rao and K.R.Ramachandra Rao, two brothers, the predecessors of the present Trustees, were interested in providing for the above "Mandagapadi" and in order to perform the same regularly and permanently and to provide funds and income had set apart some properties for the Trust. They therefore, earmarked plaint 'A' schedule property for the mandagapadi expenses by way of a registered settlement deed named as "Kaingarya" Trust deed dated 16.9.1954. Under the said deed, they have provided that "mandagapadi" must be performed in the 'A' schedule building ev


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top