P.SATHASIVAM
A. R. Ponnusamy – Appellant
Versus
Thoppalan @ Karuppa Gounder – Respondent
COMMON ORDER:
Since the issue raised in both the Revision Petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by the following common order. Defendant in O.S.No. 516 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Namakkal, aggrieved by the order dated 12-4-2002 passed in the suit, holding that the District Munsif's Court has jurisdiction to try the issue raised, has filed C.R.P.No. 797/2002 under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. The very same petitioner, aggrieved by the order of the same Court dated 26-8-2002 in I.A.No. 874/99 in O.S.No. 516/99, granting injunction and continuing the same without taking up the injunction application, has filed C.R.P.No. 1751/2002 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. According to the plaintiff/respondent herein, he filed a suit in O.S.No. 516 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif, Namakkal, against the defendant/petitioner herein for permanent injunction, restraining him (defendant/petitioner herein) from carrying on the business of stone crushing by using the stone Crushers in S.No.204/4A of Marurpatty village. In the said suit, the respondent contended that if the petitioner operates the cr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.