SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 440

A.RAMAMURTHI
P. Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Subbiah Dharmanidhi & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr. K.Srinivasan, Advocate. For the Respondents:Mr.M.S.Krishnan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The revision petitioner / tenant has preferred the present revision petition aggrieved against the fair and decretal order passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Tuticorin in RCA No.60 of 1992 dated 05.07.2002 reversing the fair and decretal order of the Rent Controller, Tuticorin passed in RCOP No.72 of 1991 dated 22.04.1992.

2. The case in brief for disposal of the revision petition is as follows:- The first respondent / landlord filed a petition under section 10(2)((ii)(a) and 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (hereinafter referred to as "Rent Control Act"), seeking eviction of the tenants from the property. The schedule mentioned property belongs to the 1st respondent / landlord and the revision petitioner was a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs.40/= payable on the 5th of every succeeding English calendar month. The building is about 60 years old and constructed of coral stones and lime. The building is in a bad condition. It is situated in the fast developing locality and other buildings adjacent and opposite side have been demolished and new buildings have come up. The Trust also decided to demolish the building and put up a ne

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top