SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 701

N.V.BALASUBRAMANIAN, T.V.MASILAMANI
Emaresan – Appellant
Versus
Radha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari, Advocate. For the Respondents:Mr.J.I.Rajkumar Roberts, Advocate.

Judgment :-

N.V.BALASUBRAMANIN, J.

This appeal arises out of a suit for partition.

2.The appellant is the defendant and the respondent in the appeal is the plaintiff. The appellant and the respondent are the brother and sister and the parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed in the plaint. The plaintiff filed the suit for partition claiming 50% of the share in the suit property and for mesne profits and for other incidental reliefs. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property belonged to her mother Ellammal, which was purchased by her by two registered deeds of sale dated 27.5.1938 and 2.5.1939. According to the plaintiff, her mother Ellammal was in possession and enjoyment of the suit property and she has also put up superstructure and she was the absolute owner of the suit property and she was in enjoyment of the suit property till her date of death on 18.10.1976. She has stated that Ellammal died intestate leaving behind the plaintiff and the defendant to succeed to her estate and the plaintiff is entitled to half share and the defendant,her brother is entitled to the other half share in the property. She has stated that it became difficult to enjoy the property as























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top