P.D.DINAKARAN
R. Anthonisamy @ Ashok – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu & Another – Respondent
Heard.
2.1. According to Mr.R. Singaravelan, learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner belongs to Kattu Naicken Community, a Schedule Tribe, as per the Community Certificates dated 23.8.1980, 22.2.1982, 27.4.1987 and 18.6.1987. However, it is not in dispute that the District Collector, Madurai, cancelled the community certificates of the petitioner, by proceedings dated 10.9.1988, against which the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai, which was dismissed by order dated 10.4.1990. Hence, the petitioner preferred a revision to the Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare, Chennai-9, which was also dismissed by order dated 26.4.1995.
2.2. In the meanwhile, the petitioner, contending that the order dated 14.6.1995 was not served on him, he moved this Court in W.P.No.2386 of 2000, wherein this Court, by order dated 15.11.2000, directed the Government to furnish a copy of the order dated 14.6.1995.
2.3. On receipt of the order dated 14.6.1995, the petitioner again filed W.P.No.1838 of 2001 challenging the order of the Government dated 26.4.1995 and this Court, by ord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.