SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 1214

P.D.DINAKARAN
Salem Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
S. Kuppannan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mrs.G.Thilakavathi, Advocate. For the Respondents:Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The revision petitioner is the defendant in suit O.S.No.223 of 2003 on the file of the Sub Court, Namakkal laid by the respondent/plaintiff for a bare injunction to restrain the revision petitioner/defendant from proceeding with the auction notification inviting the tenders for labour contract to run the petrol bunk of the petitioner/ Cooperative Sugar Mill, on the basis that the respondent/plaintiff continues to be an agreement holder for running the petrol bunk of the revision petitioner/ Cooperative Sugar Mill.

2.1. Admittedly, the respondent was appointed as a Labour Contractor to run the petrol bunk of the revision petitioner/ Cooperative Sugar Mill for a period of one year from 1.6.2000 to 31.5.2001 as per the agreement entered into between the petitioner/defendant and the respondent/ plaintiff dated 2.6.2000. The said period of contract came to an end and the revision petitioner/defendant proposed to invite tenders for labour contract to run the petrol bunk of the petitioner/Cooperative Sugar Mill, by a notice dated 22.4.2001 and the respondent also submitted his tender on 3.5.2001, which clearly shows that his contract period came to an end on 31.5.2001. However,

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top