SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 2031

K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM
Hassan Barati – Appellant
Versus
The Dean & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For The Petitioner:Vijay Narayan, Advocate. For The Respondents:R1 Sathish Parasaran, R2 M.Vellalisamy, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The petitioner is an Iranian National who having qualified himself for admission into M.B.B.S. Course in India, sought for admission in the first respondent College. He was admitted for the academic year 1995-96. He had paid Rs.3,00,000/- and as on date he had paid a total sum of Rs.6,00,000/- towards the entire course fees. When he undertook the I year examinations in April, 1997, he was given to understand that the College was not recognised by the Medical Council of India (M.C.I.) and hence he had written a letter to the M.C.I. for clarification. It is alleged by the petitioner that on the College coming to know of the said letter, started to create problems to him which continue till now. He was permitted to enter the College on the examination day only 1-1/2 hours after the examination had commenced and he was unable to pass the examination. It is further stated that the M.C.I. by their letter dated 25.11.1997, had informed him that the College was not recognised. Hence, he had filed Writ Petition No.1671 of 1998 seeking for a transfer to a recognised College. However, the said writ petition was dismissed holding that the College was a recognised institution. The p















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top