D.MURUGESAN
Siluvai Pragasam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
This petition has been filed for grant of Anticipatory Bail.
2. The petitioner has been charged for the alleged offence under Sections 120(b), 467, 468, 471, 420 read with 511 of I.P.C. According to the complaint, two persons by names Panchalingam and Rajkumar opened a bank account in a nationalised bank and presented a forged demand draft, drawn on Canadian Bank. The complaint was lodged by the Manager of the nationalised bank. Panchalingam is a Srilankan National.
In order to help him to open an account in the bank, the petitioner is said to have introduced the other accused Rajkumar to Panchalingam.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the case was registered against the petitioner also, he was not informed of the case and he was not aware of such complaint registered against him. However, he was shown by the Investigating Officer as an absconding accused. When the charge sheet was also filed, the petitioner was shown as absconding accused and therefore, learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai directed the issue of Non Bailable Warrant, exercising power under Section 204(1)(b) of Criminal Procedure Code. Learned counsel for the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.