SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 925

FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
Govindammal – Appellant
Versus
M. Akilabai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr.K.S.Gnanasambandam. For the Respondents: ----

Judgment :-

This revision has been filed as against the order of the Court below in rejecting the petitioner's application filed under Order XIII Rule 10 of C.P.C. to call for the records and suit bundles in O.S.No.2242 of 1982, City Civil Court, Madras, E.P.No.1198 of 1987 on the file of X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras W.P.No.9856 of 1993 on the file of the High Court, Madras, C.C.No.9882 of 1993, on the file of the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore O.S.No.3783 of 1983, City Civil Court, Madras and C.S.No.102 of 2000 C.R.P.No. 3895, 4684, 4685/1981 on the file of the High Court (Original Side) Madras.

2. A reading of the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present application in I.A.No.11007 of 2001 is an ample testimony to show that the whole attempt of the petitioner was only to make a roving enquiry by calling for the records of the above said proceedings. The affidavit dose not disclose in what way the above said proceedings were connected to the issue involved in the present suit as well as the stand of the petitioner. Further, when the above proceedings were of the years 1981, 1982 and 1993 if really any of the records and pleadings had any nexus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top