SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 1424

A.KULASEKARAN
Pavithra – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Raj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioners:Mr. B. Ramamoorthy. For the Respondent: Mr. T. Sivagnanam.

Judgment :-

The petitioner herein is the respondent in HMOP No. 193 of 2002 on the file of Family Court, Coimbatore. The respondent/husband has filed the above HMOP under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying for dissolution of the marriage solemnised on 17-05-2000.

2. Due to misunderstanding, the petitioner herein stayed with her parents, later she left India to pursue her studies in United States of America. In the meanwhile, she has executed a registered power of attorney dated 14-12-2001 in favour of her father, who is representing this case. The respondent/husband has filed HMOP after she has left India. The court below issued summons to the petitioner herein directing her to appear before the court on 20-05-2002, which was received by her mother. On 20-05-2002, the petitioner's father filed an application under Order III Rule 2 and Section 151 of CPC seeking permission of the Court to defend the HMOP NO. 193 of 2002 on behalf of the petitioner. The said application was returned by the court below and the petitioner herein was set ex-parte on 20-05-2002 itself. The petitioner's father has re-presented the above petition on 21-05-2002 with an endorsement th






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top