SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 1384

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
M. Shahul Hameed – Appellant
Versus
A. Salima and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For the Appellant:Mr.I. Mahaboob Sheriff, Advocate. For the Respondent: No appearance.

Judgment :-

M. Shahul Hameed, the first defendant, the appellant herein aggrieved by the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below declaring that the Talaq pronounced through the letter sent by him to his wife is not valid and granting permanent injunction to the wife/plaintiff, has filed this second appeal.

2. The case of the plaintiff is as follows:

"The plaintiff A. Salima got married to the first defendant Shahul Hameed on 2.4.1978 under Muslim rites. The first defendant, the appellant herein is an Officer in the Office of the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Madurai, the third defendant, which is under the control of the second defendant Union of India. Initially, they were living happily. The plaintiff was subjected to various medical tests to find out whether she got conceived. She was also subjected to operation. Since she became weak, she requested her husband to get transfer from Tirunelveli near Salem so that she could get treatment from Dr.Joseph, who belongs to Chennai and visits Saraswathy Nursing Home at Salem periodically. He did not agree for that. In the meantime, the plaintiff received a letter dated 30.11.1987 containing Talaq pronounceme
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top