SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 180

CHITRA VENKATARAMAN
Sigrid Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Anjappar Chettinad Restaurant rep. by its Partner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:P.B. Balaji, Advocate. For the Respondent: No appearance.

Judgment :-

(PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 22.1.2003 rejecting the unnumbered E.P.No. Of 2002 in I.A.No.20612 of 2001 in O.S.No.6980 of 2001 on the file of the XVI Assistant City Civil Court, Madras.)

This Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 22.1.2003 rejecting the unnumbered execution petition of 2002 in I.A. No.20612 of 2001 in O.S. No.6980 of 2001 on the file of XVI Asst City Civil Court, Madras. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in the suit.

2. It is seen that pending consideration of the suit, the petitioner herein prayed for an interim injunction restraining the defendant in any manner interfering the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the common area an also access to the exclusive car park of the petitioner. By order 6.12.2001, the Court below, satisfied of the prima facie case and the balance of convenience in favour of the petitioner, granted an interim injunction by order dated 20.12.2001 and directed compliance of Order 29 Rule 3, C.P.C.

3. Subsequently, the interim order granted originally was made absolute by order dated 6.6.2002. Th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top