SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 284

M.JEYAPAUL
J. Elangovan – Appellant
Versus
P. Karuppaian & Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:R. Muralidharan, Advocate. For the Respondent:-----

Judgment :-

(Revision preferred against the order dated 23.9.2005 in Crl.M.P.No.4888 of 2003 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore dismissing the complaint under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.)

The revision is filed challenging the order of dismissal of the private complaint filed by the petitioner herein under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. In the private complaint, the petitioner has alleged that the accused in the said private complaint attacked the petitioner and others with hands and legs and committed offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 341 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore has examined three witnesses including the petitioner herein on the side of the petitioner under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal procedure and having adverted to the case in C.C.No.284 of 2002 pending on the file of the very same Court, chose to dismiss the complaint as a case had already been taken on file by the said Court based on the complaint given by one Punniyamoorthy working in Talkrose Chemicals India Limited.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top