SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 420

C.NAGAPPAN
R. Ravindran – Appellant
Versus
M. Rajamanickam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:R.L. Sundaresan, Advocate. For the Respondent:K.V. Subramanian Senior Counsel, M/s.Abdul Wahab, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decretal order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruvarur, dated 29.12.2003 made in O.S.No.47/2002 now pending as O.S.No.34/2004 on the file of the District cum Sessions Court, Nagapattinam.)

The petitioner has sought for setting aside the order dated 29.12.2003 made in O.S.No.47 of 2002 on the file of Sub-Court, Tiruvarur. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit.

2. The suit is filed for recovery of a sum of Rs.5,38,000/- with subsequent interest and costs from the respondent herein/defendant. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendant borrowed two loan amounts of Rs.2,00,000/- each from the plaintiff and failed to repay the same and the suit claim is the balance outstanding in the transaction.

3. During the trial of the case, the plaintiff sought for marking Plaint document Nos.1 and 2 as exhibits on his side and that was objected to by the defendant on the ground that the documents are inadmissible in evidence. The Trial Court in the impugned order held that both the documents are promissory notes payable otherwise than on demand and as the documents












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top