SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 222

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJIT PRAKASH SHAH & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PRABHA SRIDEVAN
Indian Overseas Bank, rep.by its Deputy General Manager & Another - Appellant
Versus
P.Ganesan & Others - Respondents
Writ Appeal Nos.11 to 13 & 73 of 2006 and W.P.Nos.26176, 26177, 26178 and 26179 of 2005 and W.A.M.P.Nos.35 to 37 & 144 of 2006
Decided On : 01 February 2006

Advocates Appeared: For the Appellants:A.L. Somayaji, Senior Cousnel. For the Respondents:R1 – R4 V. Prakash, Senior Counsel, P. Chandrasekaran, Advocate.

Proceedings in a criminal case and a departmental proceeding against the same person can go on simultaneously.

Headnote:Service Law - Departmental proceedings-Proceedings in a criminal case and a departmental proceeding against the same person can go on simultaneously.

       

Judgment :-

The Hon’ble Chief Justice

Heard learned Senior Counsel for the parties, and by consent of the parties Writ Appeals as well as Writ Petitions are taken up for final hearing

2. These writ petitions are filed challenging the action of the respondent-bank in proceeding with the domestic enquiry with regard to the charge-sheet dated 21.02.2005, while criminal case on the same set of allegation is pending against the writ petitioners

3. The following facts lead to the filing of these writ petitions:

The writ petitioners are the office-bearers of the Indian overseas Bank Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe Employees’ Welfare Association. The association is registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. It is the case of the petitioners that one Mr. A. Krishnan, who was also an office-bearer of their association, floated another association and named it as All India Overseas Bank Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe Employees Welfare Association. The registration under similar name was the subject matter of challenge before the High Court in W.P.No.10030 of 2001 and this Court vide its Judgment and Order dated 23.01.2004 allowed the petition declaring the registration of the association with the same name resembling the petitioners’ association as illegal. It is the further case of the petitioners that one Mr. L. Balasubramaniam, President All India Overseas Bank Employees Association, who is impleaded in the writ petitions as 3rd respondent and Mr. A. Krishnan, started to interfere with the activities of the writ petitioners’ association. According to the petitioners on 27.01.2005 at about 12.30 pm when the General Secretary of the petitioners’ association went to the central office of the bank to discuss about the welfare measures to be taken for the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe employees of the bank, he and his associates were abused by caste and physically assaulted by Mr. L. Balasubramaniam and some other persons. As a result the General Secretary and the other office-bearers of the petitioners’ association received injuries and were admitted in the General Hospital. It is alleged by the petitioners that Mr. L. Balasubramaniam having attacked them got himself admitted in National Hospital, a private hospital, and lodged a private complaint. The General Secretary of the petitioners’ association also lodged a complaint on 27.01.2005 at about 19.15 hours against Mr. L. Balasubramaniam before the F4-Thousand Lights Police Station, Chennai under Sections 341 and 323 of IPC read with Section 3(1) of the Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and the same has been registered as Crime No.163 of 2005, and a charge sheet has also been filed before the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. It is stated that Mr. L. Balasubramaniam had also lodged a complaint against the office-bearers of the petitioners’ association and the complaint was registered in the same police station under Crime No.162 of 2005 under Sections 341, 323, 324, 427, 307 and 507(II) of the Indian Penal Code, and a charge sheet has also been filed in that case before the XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. Both the criminal cases are pending. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent-bank without conducting any preliminary investigation, straightaway issued a statement of imputation and started domestic enquiry against the petitioners alleging that the petitioners had indulged in unruly, riotous behaviour, and allegedly committed willful act of criminal assault on Mr. L. Balasubramnaiam. The statement of imputation is solely based on the criminal complaint lodged by Mr. L. Balasubramaniam. The petitioners contend that inasmuch as the criminal case against the petitioners is pending, and the disciplinary proceedings are founded on the same set of allegations, petitioners will suffer undue hardship if disciplinary proceedings are allowed to proceed especially when Mr. L. Balasubraman
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top