SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 821

P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA
D. Ramanujam – Appellant
Versus
R. Panneerselvam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:R. Muralidharan, Advocate. For the Respondent:R. Subramanian, Advocate.

Judgment :-

(Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order in I.A. No.623 of 2004 in O.S. No.113 of 2003 dated 16.02.2005 on the file of the District Munsiff’s Court, Cuddalore.)

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the fair and decreetal order in I.A. No.623 of 2004 in O.S. No.113 of 2003 dated 16.02.2005 on the file of the District Munsiff’s Court, Cuddalore.

2. The brief facts necessitated for disposal of this C.R.P. is as under:

The Plaintiff is the petitioner. The property described in the schedule belonged to one Anbazhagi, wife of S.K.Velayuda Mudaliar. The plaintiff purchased the said property from the said Anbazhagi on 18.10.1997 for a sum of Rs.66,000/-. The defendant is the respondent who is the owner of the Flat No.111 which is situated on the South of Kumar Salai, East of Plot No.112, West of Plot No.110 and North of Plot No.117. The defendant is an adjacent owner. The plaintiff is the owner of Plot Nos.112 and 117. According to the plaintiff, the defendant claims right over the disputed area i.e., a right to the extent of 30 feet in Plot No.117 which belonged to the plaintiff. Also, the d














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top